The Frugal Fiduciary Blog

Fee Study of 525 401(k) Financial Advisors – Why Trump Can’t Reverse Tide of Fiduciary Advice

Posted by Eric Droblyen on Apr 5, 2017

This week, the DOL delayed the effective date of its Fiduciary Rule – which would define all retirement plan financial advisors as ERISA fiduciaries, effectively banning conflicted 401(k) investment advice that puts advisor profit ahead of client interests – by 60 days from April 10, 2017 to June 9, 2017.  The delay was triggered by a memorandum from President Trump that directed the agency to complete a new analysis of the rule’s likely economic impact.

As a critic of the Fiduciary Rule, it’s a good bet that President Trump ordered the DOL analysis to build a case for overturning it. If that happens, it would be a huge (yuge?) victory win for brokers and insurance agents – who are currently non-fiduciaries. According to a study from the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), these advisors rake in more than $17 billion in excess fees annually due to conflicted advice.

If you are a supporter of the Fiduciary Rule like me, it can be easy to be upset by the Trump administration delay. However, I’m not worried about it. Even if this ban on conflicted retirement plan advice is squashed, I am confident the die is cast. Following several high-profile excessive fee lawsuits, more 401(k) plan sponsors than ever are hiring fiduciary-grade financial advisors to lower their liability. The kicker? Their impartial advice is often cheaper than potentially-conflicted, non-fiduciary advice. And I have the numbers to prove it!

Read More

Topics: Fiduciary Responsibiilty, 401k fees, DOL Fiduciary Rule, Provider Shopping, 401k Studies, Financial Advice

Will Trial Lawyers be the Sole Beneficiary of a Watered-Down Fiduciary Rule?

Posted by Eric Droblyen on Jul 29, 2015

The law firm of Schlichter, Bogard & Denton has had a very good couple of weeks. After winning two high profile 401k fee lawsuits, courts have approved the payment of more than $31.9 million in legal fees. The defendants in these cases were Lockheed Martin Corp and Ameriprise Financial, fiduciaries of their respective 401k plans. The plaintiffs, represented by Schlichter, were 401k participants.  The 401k participants claimed their plan fiduciaries failed to protect them from excessive fees – a primary fiduciary responsibility. The courts agreed, awarding participants $90 million in damages.

These settlement fees got me thinking about the DOL’s proposed fiduciary rule. Would the proposal, if implemented, give trial lawyers more fodder for excessive 401k fee lawsuits?  I think it would.

Read More

Topics: Fiduciary Responsibiilty, DOL Fiduciary Rule

The DOL’s Fiduciary Rule: Why Can’t Regulators do Simple?

Posted by Eric Droblyen on Jun 17, 2015

Since the DOL released its fiduciary proposal, I’ve been trying to digest it so I can provide any concerns to the DOL during their comment period.  This has not been an easy task.  The DOL’s proposal is complex.  My review got me thinking about DOL regulations in general – why aren’t they less complicated? I think they can be, being more effective in the process. 

Read More

Topics: DOL Fiduciary Rule

DOL’s Fiduciary Rule Advances to OMB; Not Everyone is Happy about It

Posted by Eric Droblyen on Mar 4, 2015

On February 23, 2015, President Obama announced that the long-awaited redrafting of the DOL’s “fiduciary rule” was being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This rule, also called the “conflict of interest rule for investment advice,” would subject all financial advisors who provide investment advice to retirement plans to a fiduciary (conflict-free) standard of care.

Read More

Topics: DOL Fiduciary Rule, Financial Advice

NAPA stakes a position against the DOL’s fiduciary rule

Posted by Eric Droblyen on Jan 26, 2015

This month, the DOL is expected to propose a “fiduciary rule” for financial advisors that provide investment advice to retirement plans. This rule, also called the “conflict of interest rule for investment advice,” would subject brokers to the same fiduciary obligations as investment advisers. The DOL proposed a fiduciary rule in 2010, but that proposal was withdrawn in 2011 under heavy pressure from some lawmakers and lobbyists representing the financial services industry.
Read More

Topics: DOL Fiduciary Rule, Financial Advice

Subscribe to Email Updates


“We want you and your employees to have a successful plan.” Greg Carpenter, CEO of Employee Fiduciary, explains how low fees help keep your money in the market, working for you.

Request a Proposal